Total Conservation Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,684,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John C Dennison Trust | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,894 |
22 | Daniel Joseph Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,861 |
23 | David John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,861 |
24 | John R Bernard | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,542 |
25 | , | $21,260 | |
26 | Lieber Land Holdings LLC | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $21,192 |
27 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $20,433 |
28 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $19,502 |
29 | Eleanor Jane Wevik | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,713 |
30 | , | $17,536 | |
31 | Daniel Howard O'connor | Lead, SD 57754 | $17,181 |
32 | Gerald Flannery | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $16,482 |
33 | Bryan Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,091 |
34 | Dean Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,091 |
35 | Daniel Beutler | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $15,925 |
36 | Larry Orr | Beresford, SD 57004 | $15,734 |
37 | Alyce Faye Law | Des Moines, IA 50320 | $13,732 |
38 | Scott Wagner | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $13,728 |
39 | Dennis Manning | Burbank, SD 57010 | $12,863 |
40 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,298 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”