Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 503
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lewis Joseph Kribell | Alcester, SD 57001 | $2,051 |
42 | Stuart Lee Heiman | Alcester, SD 57001 | $2,025 |
43 | J Quinten Miller | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,910 |
44 | Russell Martin Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,844 |
45 | Jeffrey Blumer | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,826 |
46 | Gerald James Van Wyk | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $1,807 |
47 | Donald L Offerdahl Estate | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,800 |
48 | Brian Patrick Mcinerney | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,787 |
49 | Stan Van Wyk | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $1,775 |
50 | Duane Wade Langle | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,640 |
51 | Thomas Jerry Manning | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,598 |
52 | Wayne H Siemers | Lennox, SD 57039 | $1,597 |
53 | Keith Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,586 |
54 | Dallas Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,578 |
55 | Eldean Helmer Wevik | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,568 |
56 | Charles Vreugdenhil | Alcester, SD 57001 | $1,562 |
57 | Douglas Dale Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,468 |
58 | Dale Marlow Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,462 |
59 | Ronald Lee Olsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,458 |
60 | Kirk Lee Miller | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,204 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”