Farm Subsidy information
Union County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $15,241,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $30,825 |
42 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $30,717 |
43 | Travis John Stene | Alcester, SD 57001 | $29,972 |
44 | Keiser Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $29,397 |
45 | Randy James Erickson | Akron, IA 51001 | $29,232 |
46 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $29,196 |
47 | , | $27,917 | |
48 | Thomas Dennison | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $27,727 |
49 | Kersten L Johnson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $26,896 |
50 | Chen Beverly Chow | El Dorado Hls, CA 95762 | $26,757 |
51 | Thomas R Sullivan | Burbank, SD 57010 | $25,960 |
52 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $25,075 |
53 | John Edward Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $24,776 |
54 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $24,752 |
55 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $24,688 |
56 | Gerald Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $23,964 |
57 | , | $23,871 | |
58 | Dean Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $23,720 |
59 | Bryan Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $23,717 |
60 | James Melvin Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $23,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”