Total Disaster Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 300
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $3,268,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $18,842 |
42 | Nicholas Dwight Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $18,765 |
43 | Randall Scott Ronning | Alcester, SD 57001 | $18,559 |
44 | Zackari John Debruin | Alcester, SD 57001 | $17,721 |
45 | Arden Elmer Heeren | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $17,627 |
46 | Bruce Evan Klemme | Akron, IA 51001 | $17,582 |
47 | Shaun Michael Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $17,420 |
48 | Austin Charles Willms | Akron, IA 51001 | $16,465 |
49 | Alex Conrad Merrick | Akron, IA 51001 | $16,311 |
50 | Ryan Todd Ronning | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,118 |
51 | Harley Philip Lerseth | Beresford, SD 57004 | $16,029 |
52 | Benjamin Lloyd Johnson | Hudson, SD 57034 | $15,857 |
53 | Adam Arthur Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $15,770 |
54 | Stuart Marvin Carlson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $15,638 |
55 | Mark William Scott | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $15,400 |
56 | Dale Marlow Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $15,236 |
57 | David John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $15,149 |
58 | , | $14,912 | |
59 | Richard Harry Kratochvil | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $14,697 |
60 | , | $14,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”