Direct Payment Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,265
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $43,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Charles Craig Nygard | Akron, IA 51001 | $217,520 |
42 | Theresa Ann Geary | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $213,937 |
43 | Marimac Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $211,450 |
44 | David Wendell Larsen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $209,003 |
45 | Brian Elmire Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $205,318 |
46 | John Steven Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $202,840 |
47 | Ronald Jeffrey Massey | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $199,847 |
48 | Eldon Waldamar Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $196,736 |
49 | Keith Roger Anderson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $194,332 |
50 | Ronald Gene Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $193,833 |
51 | Steven Ross Rommereim | Alcester, SD 57001 | $192,462 |
52 | James William Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $191,644 |
53 | Ronning Farms | Alcester, SD 57001 | $186,880 |
54 | Brad William Vreugdenhil | Akron, IA 51001 | $181,790 |
55 | Thomas Marvin Ray | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $181,785 |
56 | Michael Robert Nelson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $180,401 |
57 | Douglas Russell Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $179,108 |
58 | Reid Allen Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $178,975 |
59 | Randall Mollet | Burbank, SD 57010 | $175,291 |
60 | Keith Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $173,752 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”