Total Conservation Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 286
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,801,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Scott Wagner | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,458 |
42 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,300 |
43 | Brent J Beaulieu | Sioux City, IA 51108 | $12,000 |
44 | Jonathan M Manning Irrevocable Family Legacy Trust | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $11,968 |
45 | Robert Edward Woodard | Burbank, SD 57010 | $11,692 |
46 | Connors Family Ltd Partnership | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $11,126 |
47 | Meltzer Family 2013 Trust | Beresford, SD 57004 | $11,112 |
48 | Douglas E Eisma | Luverne, MN 56156 | $10,815 |
49 | Dakota Eastern Ltd | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,731 |
50 | Shane D Bosse | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,520 |
51 | Chicoine Legacy Farm, LLC | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,126 |
52 | Donald Gene Jorgensen | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $9,223 |
53 | Larry Orr | Beresford, SD 57004 | $9,129 |
54 | Curtis Elwood Winquist | Akron, IA 51001 | $9,093 |
55 | Devin L Erickson | Saint Johns, FL 32259 | $8,493 |
56 | Randy T Erickson | Sun City Ctr, FL 33573 | $8,493 |
57 | Cory M Erickson | Milwaukee, WI 53207 | $8,488 |
58 | Rene Eriksen | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $8,459 |
59 | Marlin Day | Hudson, SD 57034 | $8,119 |
60 | Dolores Ann Sommervold | Akron, IA 51001 | $8,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”