Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 503
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jerry Leroy Duhaime | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $1,105 |
62 | Leonard Gayland Small | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,067 |
63 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $1,058 |
64 | Richard Lowell Merrick | Alcester, SD 57001 | $1,055 |
65 | Todd Kendall Merrick | Alcester, SD 57001 | $1,055 |
66 | Steve Hofland | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $1,052 |
67 | Jay A Miller | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,020 |
68 | David Leo Manning | Burbank, SD 57010 | $1,000 |
69 | Robert Palmer Hustrulid | Beresford, SD 57004 | $987 |
70 | Norman George Erickson | Beresford, SD 57004 | $977 |
71 | Lee Ladelle Briggle | Alcester, SD 57001 | $935 |
72 | Timothy Carl Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $934 |
73 | Richard Charles Johnson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $890 |
74 | Dennis Raymond Moller | Alcester, SD 57001 | $853 |
75 | Donald Eugene Laferrier | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $841 |
76 | Loren Niels Nielsen | Akron, IA 51001 | $809 |
77 | Lance Matthew Nielsen | Akron, IA 51001 | $808 |
78 | Thomas Vincent Sullivan | Burbank, SD 57010 | $785 |
79 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $750 |
80 | Kathleen Marie Sandau | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”