Farm Subsidy information
Union County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $381,671,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $819,030 |
62 | Brad William Vreugdenhil | Akron, IA 51001 | $811,412 |
63 | Charles Craig Nygard | Akron, IA 51001 | $801,425 |
64 | Scott Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $796,748 |
65 | Rodney Russell Ballinger | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $784,144 |
66 | Bradley Allen Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $774,741 |
67 | Ronald Gene Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $766,427 |
68 | Ronald Jeffrey Massey | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $756,353 |
69 | John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $749,746 |
70 | Timothy Alan Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $749,172 |
71 | Keith Roger Anderson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $742,365 |
72 | Thomas Marvin Ray | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $740,136 |
73 | Martin Patrick Mcinerney | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $733,108 |
74 | Gary R Heeren | Akron, IA 51001 | $726,152 |
75 | Keith Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $724,128 |
76 | Arden Kay Wiksen | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $716,781 |
77 | Robert Jager | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $709,521 |
78 | Richard Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $702,211 |
79 | Allen Arthur Pace | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $698,820 |
80 | Roger Dailey | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $694,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”