Farm Subsidy information
Union County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 526
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $15,241,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John C Dennison Trust | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,894 |
62 | Daniel Joseph Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,861 |
63 | Bruce Evan Klemme | Akron, IA 51001 | $22,836 |
64 | Robert Duane Keizer | Akron, IA 51001 | $22,752 |
65 | Chad Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,504 |
66 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $22,405 |
67 | Lance Matthew Nielsen | Akron, IA 51001 | $22,166 |
68 | Darin Neil Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $22,094 |
69 | , | $21,583 | |
70 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $21,440 |
71 | , | $21,260 | |
72 | Vaughn Arden Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $21,196 |
73 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $20,433 |
74 | , | $20,068 | |
75 | Jeffrey Michael Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $19,741 |
76 | Nathan Lee Solberg | Akron, IA 51001 | $19,683 |
77 | Zackari John Debruin | Alcester, SD 57001 | $19,514 |
78 | Nicholas Dwight Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $19,278 |
79 | Adam Arthur Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $19,170 |
80 | Eleanor Jane Wevik | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”