Total Emergency Relief Program in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 241
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $2,798,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jason D Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $12,893 |
62 | Nathan Lee Solberg | Akron, IA 51001 | $12,493 |
63 | Douglas Dale Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $12,425 |
64 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $12,337 |
65 | Olsen Family Farm LLC | Beresford, SD 57004 | $12,047 |
66 | Jeremiah James Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,719 |
67 | Union Valley Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $11,717 |
68 | Arden Elmer Heeren | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,633 |
69 | Mark Rus | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,564 |
70 | Arden Kay Wiksen | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $11,520 |
71 | D & M Hamilton Farms LLC | Hudson, SD 57034 | $11,514 |
72 | Daniel N Erickson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,393 |
73 | Robert John Geary | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,305 |
74 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,230 |
75 | Dean John Kellen | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,138 |
76 | David Wendell Larsen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $10,689 |
77 | Dennis Raymond Moller | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,654 |
78 | Alex Conrad Merrick | Akron, IA 51001 | $10,654 |
79 | , | $10,610 | |
80 | Ronald Wesley Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $10,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”