Market Loss Assistance Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,078
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $13,480,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $47,164 |
62 | Montagne Farms Part | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $46,398 |
63 | Todd Kendall Merrick | Alcester, SD 57001 | $45,529 |
64 | Keith Roger Anderson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $45,510 |
65 | Delmer A Stene | Alcester, SD 57001 | $44,884 |
66 | Wilbur Minert Hartman | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $44,516 |
67 | Clay Tyler Clark | Alcester, SD 57001 | $44,479 |
68 | Michael Joseph Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $44,468 |
69 | Elva June Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $44,270 |
70 | Lafleur Farms | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $44,172 |
71 | Marlow Ralph Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $43,400 |
72 | Bernard L Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $43,119 |
73 | Richard Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $43,108 |
74 | Darmon Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $43,107 |
75 | Norman L Shedd | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $42,066 |
76 | Martin Bertrand | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $41,643 |
77 | Douglas J Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $41,585 |
78 | Steven Darrell Johnson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $41,572 |
79 | Dennis David Treiber | Hudson, SD 57034 | $41,404 |
80 | Jerry Eddie Kratochvil | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $41,047 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”