Direct Payment Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,265
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $43,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joseph Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $141,803 |
82 | Jerry Leroy Duhaime | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $141,329 |
83 | Craig Stephen Mcinerney | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $140,880 |
84 | Nicholas Dwight Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $140,364 |
85 | Allen Arthur Pace | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $140,136 |
86 | Mark Edmund Chicoine | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $139,335 |
87 | Bradley Fred Kleinhans | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $137,084 |
88 | Bradley Allen Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $135,916 |
89 | Lynn Raye Mollet | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $135,664 |
90 | Tornberg Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $134,897 |
91 | Michael Lee Norton | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $134,116 |
92 | Jerry Cameron Johnson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $133,354 |
93 | Kenneth Gene Kingma | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $132,070 |
94 | Allen Dean Kingma | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $132,060 |
95 | Gerald Donald Benjamin | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $131,944 |
96 | Robert Jager | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $130,309 |
97 | Brian Patrick Mcinerney | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $129,057 |
98 | Jerry Eddie Kratochvil | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $128,279 |
99 | Lance D Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $127,991 |
100 | Michael John Schmitz | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $127,877 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”