Total Emergency Relief Program in Union County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 241
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $2,798,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $10,526 | |
82 | Donald Ralph Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $10,517 |
83 | Timothy Huenink | Beresford, SD 57004 | $10,386 |
84 | Alan Leroy Sommervold | Akron, IA 51001 | $10,335 |
85 | Aaron C Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $10,206 |
86 | Lykken Hillview Farm Inc | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,095 |
87 | Luke John Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $10,086 |
88 | Michael Arthur Peterson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $9,904 |
89 | John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $9,900 |
90 | Brian Gayland Small | Akron, IA 51001 | $9,785 |
91 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $9,694 |
92 | Gerald James Van Wyk | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $9,692 |
93 | Robert Duane Keizer | Akron, IA 51001 | $9,677 |
94 | Kama Margaret Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $9,670 |
95 | Patricia A Hoffman | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $9,612 |
96 | Brule Creek Farms | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $9,576 |
97 | Kelly Inberg | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $9,491 |
98 | Terry Alan Kjose | Alcester, SD 57001 | $9,471 |
99 | River Valley Farms LLC | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $9,454 |
100 | Eugene Alfred Swanson | Akron, IA 51001 | $9,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”