Market Gains in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 320
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $7,651,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Robert Wendell Fletcher | Akron, IA 51001 | $34,093 |
82 | Marimac Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $33,465 |
83 | Ronald Lee Olsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $32,672 |
84 | Wilbur Minert Hartman | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $32,055 |
85 | Robert John Geary | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $31,509 |
86 | Keith Vance Kirkebak | Beresford, SD 57004 | $31,417 |
87 | Philip Oliver Lerseth | Beresford, SD 57004 | $31,357 |
88 | Ballinger Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $31,009 |
89 | Ronald William Siemers Jr | Buffalo, MN 55313 | $31,005 |
90 | Joel Nordell Johnson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $30,708 |
91 | Kenny C Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $30,306 |
92 | Daniel Lee Hedeen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $30,187 |
93 | Jeffrey Darrel Hedeen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $30,187 |
94 | Gary Clifford Glover | Burbank, SD 57010 | $29,713 |
95 | Norman L Shedd | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $28,247 |
96 | Roger Hilton Sonichsen | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $27,785 |
97 | Delmer A Stene | Alcester, SD 57001 | $27,297 |
98 | Lloyd Everett Lundberg | Alcester, SD 57001 | $27,207 |
99 | David Ray Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $26,408 |
100 | Thomas Edward Nason | Akron, IA 51001 | $25,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”