Total Conservation Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,684,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Timothy Carl Hall | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $5,873 |
82 | Terrie Rasheed | Sioux City, IA 51104 | $5,766 |
83 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $5,757 |
84 | Dale Thomas Bosse | Westfield, IA 51062 | $5,641 |
85 | Bradley Allen Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $5,620 |
86 | Kelvin Gabel | Beresford, SD 57004 | $5,538 |
87 | Robert Palmer Hustrulid | Beresford, SD 57004 | $5,002 |
88 | Mark Moir Heeren | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,893 |
89 | Robin Raymond Heeren | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,893 |
90 | Robert Bohan | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $4,847 |
91 | , | $4,847 | |
92 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,474 |
93 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $4,456 |
94 | Eleanor Hitzemann | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,380 |
95 | , | $4,209 | |
96 | Phillip Corio Jr | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $4,158 |
97 | Michael Joseph Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $4,150 |
98 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $4,150 |
99 | Harry James O'connor | Burbank, SD 57010 | $4,101 |
100 | Terry K Olthoff | Arvada, CO 80005 | $3,934 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”