Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 503
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Wade A Wiksen | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $80 |
102 | Booge Properties Ltd Ptr | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $73 |
103 | John Wiksen | Nixa, MO 65714 | $70 |
104 | Trudeau Family Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $70 |
105 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $68 |
106 | Thomas Marvin Ray | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $65 |
107 | Agricultural & Industrial Investm | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $63 |
108 | Mark Moir Heeren | Akron, IA 51001 | $62 |
109 | Ronald Wesley Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $62 |
110 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $59 |
111 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $59 |
112 | Timothy Alan Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $59 |
113 | Kevin Gordon Beermann | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $54 |
114 | Elva June Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $53 |
115 | Marimac Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $52 |
116 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $50 |
117 | Randall Mollet | Burbank, SD 57010 | $47 |
118 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $46 |
119 | Mark Edmund Chicoine | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $46 |
120 | Timothy W Bishop | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $43 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”