Farm Subsidy information
Union County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Union County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 704
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $16,495,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Marimac Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $24,901 |
102 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $24,733 |
103 | Joseph Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $24,628 |
104 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $24,201 |
105 | Michael James Hanson | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $24,054 |
106 | Gerald Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $23,964 |
107 | Cloverleaf Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $23,053 |
108 | John C Dennison Trust | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,894 |
109 | Thomas John Corio | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,811 |
110 | Bradley Fred Kleinhans | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $22,789 |
111 | Hanson Homestead Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,784 |
112 | Chico Ag LLC | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,637 |
113 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,552 |
114 | John R Bernard | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,543 |
115 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $22,402 |
116 | Cody James Gradert | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $22,391 |
117 | Michael Joseph Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,364 |
118 | Martin Patrick Mcinerney | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $22,244 |
119 | Wendell Bishop | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $22,230 |
120 | Dean Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $21,595 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”