Conservation Reserve Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 737
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $27,070,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Chicoine Legacy Farm, LLC | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $68,161 |
102 | Meltzer Family 2013 Trust | Beresford, SD 57004 | $67,066 |
103 | Jaclyn Jean Corio | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $66,688 |
104 | Simon Family Bypass C Trust | Sioux City, IA 51106 | $66,450 |
105 | Winquist Dairy Farms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $66,390 |
106 | Robert Palmer Hustrulid | Beresford, SD 57004 | $64,270 |
107 | Thomas J Cole | Alcester, SD 57001 | $62,967 |
108 | Sd Secretary Of State | Pierre, SD 57501 | $62,355 |
109 | Paul S Minor | North Sioux City, SD 57049 | $61,111 |
110 | Devin L Erickson | Saint Johns, FL 32259 | $60,403 |
111 | Cory M Erickson | Milwaukee, WI 53207 | $60,371 |
112 | Melvin Hitzemann | Akron, IA 51001 | $59,537 |
113 | Steven Harold Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $58,862 |
114 | David Lee Inberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $58,729 |
115 | Kelvin Gabel | Beresford, SD 57004 | $58,674 |
116 | Timothy Alan Winquist | Alcester, SD 57001 | $58,546 |
117 | David Herbert Swanson | Hot Springs, SD 57747 | $58,328 |
118 | George Simon | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $58,100 |
119 | Raymond Waag | Akron, IA 51001 | $57,278 |
120 | Clifford Waag | Akron, IA 51001 | $56,901 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”