Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 844
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $22,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lafleur Farms | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $56,840 |
122 | Larry Dean Young | Alcester, SD 57001 | $56,702 |
123 | Ryan Todd Ronning | Alcester, SD 57001 | $56,371 |
124 | Aaron C Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $56,160 |
125 | Arden A Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $55,961 |
126 | Martin F Jorgensen | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $54,992 |
127 | Gerald Donald Benjamin | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $54,708 |
128 | Jason D Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $53,454 |
129 | Jerry Cameron Johnson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $53,168 |
130 | Vr & Sons | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $53,089 |
131 | B & J Farms | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $52,849 |
132 | Milo Bruce Twedt | Beresford, SD 57004 | $52,144 |
133 | Terrie Rasheed | Sioux City, IA 51104 | $51,455 |
134 | Jeffrey Michael Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $50,582 |
135 | Kendall Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $50,525 |
136 | Cory Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $50,209 |
137 | Nicholas Lee Sievers | Beresford, SD 57004 | $49,378 |
138 | Lance Matthew Nielsen | Akron, IA 51001 | $49,125 |
139 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $48,502 |
140 | Lance D Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $48,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”