Total Conservation Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,684,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | , | $2,736 | |
122 | Terry Rosenbaum | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $2,656 |
123 | Wevik Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $2,634 |
124 | Brian Elmire Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $2,596 |
125 | John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $2,492 |
126 | Thomas Schaefer | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $2,470 |
127 | Randall Jay Terpstra | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $2,452 |
128 | Melvin Ernest Gabel | Beresford, SD 57004 | $2,428 |
129 | David Michael Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $2,422 |
130 | Randy James Erickson | Akron, IA 51001 | $2,408 |
131 | Jane Marie Green Revocable Trust | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $2,361 |
132 | Tornberg Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $2,203 |
133 | Ronald Helgerson | Atascadero, CA 93422 | $2,197 |
134 | Kathleen M Nissen | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $1,968 |
135 | Michael Herbert Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $1,912 |
136 | Joseph Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $1,897 |
137 | Thomas Jerry Manning | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,884 |
138 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,863 |
139 | Stephen Schmitz | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $1,836 |
140 | Patricia A Olson | Sioux City, IA 51103 | $1,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”