Market Gains in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 320
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $7,651,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Thomas John Corio | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $14,795 |
142 | Michael Dennis Manning | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $14,454 |
143 | James Douglas Scott | Rock Valley, IA 51247 | $14,228 |
144 | William John Scott | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $14,228 |
145 | Vanballegooyen Bros | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $14,050 |
146 | Bernard O Ofstehage | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $13,618 |
147 | Joseph Fabian Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $13,152 |
148 | Mark Edmund Chicoine | Dakota Dunes, SD 57049 | $13,152 |
149 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $13,090 |
150 | Duncan Farms Limited | Alcester, SD 57001 | $13,063 |
151 | David Alan Van Engen | Alcester, SD 57001 | $13,047 |
152 | Timothy W Bishop | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,800 |
153 | Kevin Gordon Beermann | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,704 |
154 | Rodney Duane Schempp | Alcester, SD 57001 | $12,693 |
155 | Kathleen Maxine Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,579 |
156 | Gary Don Lockhorst | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $12,199 |
157 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $11,998 |
158 | Dennis Raymond Moller | Alcester, SD 57001 | $11,684 |
159 | Thomas Jerry Manning | Beresford, SD 57004 | $11,343 |
160 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”