Oilseed Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 827
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $2,152,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $12,254 |
22 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $11,886 |
23 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $11,606 |
24 | Daniel Howard O'connor | Lead, SD 57754 | $11,606 |
25 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,593 |
26 | Douglas J Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $11,548 |
27 | John James Hanson | Mccook Lake, SD 57049 | $11,470 |
28 | Reid Allen Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,422 |
29 | R L Peterson Rev Trust | Sergeant Bluff, IA 51054 | $11,323 |
30 | Ronald Jeffrey Massey | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $11,200 |
31 | Michael Herbert Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,991 |
32 | Curry William & David | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,866 |
33 | Dennis Manning | Burbank, SD 57010 | $10,754 |
34 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,753 |
35 | Michael Joseph Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $10,635 |
36 | Robert Norton | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $10,618 |
37 | Marimac Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $10,402 |
38 | Robert Jager | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $10,272 |
39 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,200 |
40 | Harold George Young | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”