Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Union County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $261,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Herbert Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $10,566 |
2 | Paul Edward Dailey | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $8,842 |
3 | Jaron Scott Van Beek | Worthing, SD 57077 | $8,682 |
4 | Robert Duane Keizer | Akron, IA 51001 | $8,679 |
5 | Larry F Noll | Akron, IA 51001 | $8,286 |
6 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $7,012 |
7 | Kelly Paul Ahart | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $6,820 |
8 | Tornberg Farms Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $6,231 |
9 | Arden Elmer Heeren | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $6,128 |
10 | Gary R Heeren | Akron, IA 51001 | $5,590 |
11 | Edward Oliver Williams | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $5,305 |
12 | John Brent Van De Stroet | Fairview, SD 57027 | $5,286 |
13 | Mace Van De Stroet | Inwood, IA 51240 | $5,270 |
14 | Darrin E Van De Stroet | Inwood, IA 51240 | $5,270 |
15 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $5,096 |
16 | Alex Conrad Merrick | Akron, IA 51001 | $5,036 |
17 | Randy James Erickson | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,383 |
18 | Nathan Lee Solberg | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,300 |
19 | Kyle Kenefick | Alcester, SD 57001 | $4,227 |
20 | Bruce Lawrence Ericson | Akron, IA 51001 | $4,176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>