Counter Cyclical Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 863
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $8,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cloverleaf Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $111,619 |
2 | John Henry Hartemink | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $96,947 |
3 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $92,774 |
4 | Vansloten & Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $86,018 |
5 | Curry William & David | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $80,228 |
6 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $69,749 |
7 | Trudeau Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $69,201 |
8 | David Michael Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $69,093 |
9 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $67,696 |
10 | Delynn Dana Stene | Alcester, SD 57001 | $67,505 |
11 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $67,103 |
12 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $66,556 |
13 | Michael James Hanson | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $64,693 |
14 | David Wendell Larsen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $62,091 |
15 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $62,070 |
16 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $60,033 |
17 | Brian Elmire Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $57,915 |
18 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $54,600 |
19 | Thomas William Curry | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $53,722 |
20 | Keiser Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $52,468 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>