Counter Cyclical Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 863
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $8,052,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven Harold Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $51,360 |
22 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $51,297 |
23 | Bill B Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $49,425 |
24 | George Charles Donnelly Sr | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $48,162 |
25 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $47,518 |
26 | Theresa Ann Geary | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $47,474 |
27 | Ronald Wesley Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $46,059 |
28 | Michael James Chicoine | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $45,460 |
29 | Less Farms | Merrill, IA 51038 | $45,228 |
30 | Randy James Erickson | Akron, IA 51001 | $45,176 |
31 | Michael Herbert Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $44,729 |
32 | Davis & Davis | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $44,721 |
33 | Richard Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $44,037 |
34 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $43,132 |
35 | Vaughn Arden Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $42,654 |
36 | Appley Farms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $42,093 |
37 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $41,799 |
38 | Melvin Thomas Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $41,787 |
39 | Stephen Bernard Allard | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $40,755 |
40 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $40,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”