Total Emergency Relief Program in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 285
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $4,631,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert Peter Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $199,341 |
2 | Union Valley Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $151,784 |
3 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $149,688 |
4 | Dmg Family Farm LLC | Ireton, IA 51027 | $148,458 |
5 | Henry Vansloten | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $105,855 |
6 | Travis John Stene | Alcester, SD 57001 | $86,105 |
7 | Mark Rus | Alcester, SD 57001 | $79,166 |
8 | Robert John Geary | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $77,976 |
9 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $70,191 |
10 | Michael James Hanson | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $70,146 |
11 | Tuney J Schreur | Alcester, SD 57001 | $65,448 |
12 | Douglas Dale Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $63,719 |
13 | Aaron C Boyer | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $58,527 |
14 | Michael Arthur Peterson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $53,824 |
15 | Dale Marlow Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $53,555 |
16 | Jeffrey Michael Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $49,437 |
17 | Howard James Erickson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $48,272 |
18 | Thomas R Sullivan | Burbank, SD 57010 | $45,494 |
19 | Matthew Michael Schmitz | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $43,894 |
20 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $42,769 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>