Loan Deficiency in Union County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,092
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $32,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $391,794 |
2 | Trudeau Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $374,340 |
3 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $361,216 |
4 | Vansloten & Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $340,472 |
5 | George Charles Donnelly Sr | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $328,828 |
6 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $327,516 |
7 | David Wendell Larsen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $309,395 |
8 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $285,506 |
9 | Loren Brent Nilson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $279,147 |
10 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $258,259 |
11 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $242,663 |
12 | John Steven Donnelly | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $237,964 |
13 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $217,836 |
14 | Larry Lee Nilson | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $213,905 |
15 | Cloverleaf Farms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $213,611 |
16 | Ronald Wesley Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $204,925 |
17 | Thomas Marvin Ray | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $204,271 |
18 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $196,039 |
19 | Thomas William Curry | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $194,770 |
20 | Daniel Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $192,567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>