Total Conservation Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 286
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $1,801,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darin O Erickson | Northridge, CA 91326 | $25,478 |
22 | Gerald Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $23,964 |
23 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $23,222 |
24 | Thomas Dennison | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,894 |
25 | John C Dennison Trust | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $22,894 |
26 | John R Bernard | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $22,543 |
27 | Jean Ann Girard Living Tr | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $21,583 |
28 | Lawrence R Strawbridge Liv Trust 2021 | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $21,260 |
29 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $20,579 |
30 | Michael Joseph Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $20,433 |
31 | Eleanor Jane Wevik | Beresford, SD 57004 | $18,713 |
32 | Daniel Howard O'connor | Lead, SD 57754 | $17,181 |
33 | Cole Daniel Langel | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $16,577 |
34 | Gerald Flannery | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $16,482 |
35 | Bryan Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,091 |
36 | Dean Sommervold | Alcester, SD 57001 | $16,091 |
37 | Helen A Quirk Estate | Minneapolis, MN 55410 | $15,739 |
38 | Alyce Faye Law | Des Moines, IA 50320 | $13,732 |
39 | Jeffrey T Muhlenkort | Beresford, SD 57004 | $12,999 |
40 | Dennis Manning | Burbank, SD 57010 | $12,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”