Total Commodity Programs in Union County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 516
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $5,454,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $44,015 |
22 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $43,815 |
23 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $40,823 |
24 | Michael James Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $40,120 |
25 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $39,335 |
26 | Neil Myron Shuck | Beresford, SD 57004 | $38,724 |
27 | Chad Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $38,541 |
28 | Douglas Dale Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $38,304 |
29 | Matthew Michael Schmitz | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $37,968 |
30 | Adam Holmes Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $37,961 |
31 | David Michael Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $37,957 |
32 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $37,786 |
33 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $37,786 |
34 | Dale Marlow Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $37,240 |
35 | Craig Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $36,170 |
36 | Wevik Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $35,339 |
37 | Benjamin Lloyd Johnson | Hudson, SD 57034 | $34,500 |
38 | Mockler Farms LLC | Burbank, SD 57010 | $34,238 |
39 | Scott Joseph Hanson | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $34,154 |
40 | Kelly Joseph O'connor | Meckling, SD 57069 | $32,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”