Deficiency Payment in Yankton County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 956
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Yankton County, South Dakota totaled $1,987,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jerome Francis Mueller | Saint Helena, NE 68774 | $7,389 |
42 | Stuart Huber | Irene, SD 57037 | $7,309 |
43 | Kenneth Ray Jensen | Irene, SD 57037 | $7,268 |
44 | Doyle Olsen | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $7,245 |
45 | Robert G Smith | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $7,160 |
46 | Schmidt Brothers | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $7,126 |
47 | Todd Knutson | Utica, SD 57067 | $7,125 |
48 | John M Goeken | Utica, SD 57067 | $7,100 |
49 | Curtis L Ulmer | Menno, SD 57045 | $7,079 |
50 | David G Sternhagen | Yankton, SD 57078 | $7,017 |
51 | Robert N Lucas | Irene, SD 57037 | $6,921 |
52 | Tim Rudd | Irene, SD 57037 | $6,725 |
53 | Wayne Hinseth | Irene, SD 57037 | $6,610 |
54 | Lawrence Lee Schwarz | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,604 |
55 | Gerald R Law | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,583 |
56 | Lavern Kirschenman | Menno, SD 57045 | $6,481 |
57 | Wayne H Smith | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,456 |
58 | Ronald J Miller | Gayville, SD 57031 | $6,403 |
59 | Ronald E Schaeffer | Menno, SD 57045 | $6,378 |
60 | George Sees | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $6,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”