Total Commodity Programs in Yankton County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 660
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yankton County, South Dakota totaled $5,313,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Karl Schenk II | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $18,174 |
82 | Jared J Stark | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $18,122 |
83 | Randel Tjeerdsma | Yankton, SD 57078 | $18,014 |
84 | Rodney Roy Anderson | Yankton, SD 57078 | $18,010 |
85 | Michael Dale Swensen | Irene, SD 57037 | $17,622 |
86 | Donald J Mcdonald | Yankton, SD 57078 | $17,336 |
87 | Jacob Daniel Hacecky | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $17,140 |
88 | Joseph D Syrovatka | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $17,118 |
89 | Frederick Vernon Gall | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $17,116 |
90 | Mark D Fischer | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $17,099 |
91 | Mark A Ryken | Yankton, SD 57078 | $17,085 |
92 | Walnut Grove Farms LLC | Yankton, SD 57078 | $16,900 |
93 | Mark Hejna | Tabor, SD 57063 | $16,808 |
94 | Curtis L Ulmer | Menno, SD 57045 | $16,769 |
95 | Don Bingham Farms LLC | Yankton, SD 57078 | $16,585 |
96 | Dean Joseph Vaith | Menno, SD 57045 | $16,519 |
97 | Darrell Nelson Farms Inc | Yankton, SD 57078 | $16,497 |
98 | John D Brockmueller | Irene, SD 57037 | $16,470 |
99 | Karen Ann Huber | Mission Hill, SD 57046 | $16,397 |
100 | Gary Hoxeng | Volin, SD 57072 | $16,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”