Total Conservation Programs in Yankton County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 273
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Yankton County, South Dakota totaled $2,276,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mavis L Malloy | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $6,944 |
102 | Bruce Teachout | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,932 |
103 | Ryan L Guthmiller | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,817 |
104 | Rodney Roy Anderson | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,734 |
105 | Cheri R Loest Revocable Trust- Beaver Creek Ranch | Utica, SD 57067 | $6,635 |
106 | Rodney T Schramm | Utica, SD 57067 | $6,614 |
107 | David Charles Stibral | Tabor, SD 57063 | $6,496 |
108 | Bruce G Heirigs | Irene, SD 57037 | $6,426 |
109 | Karen Nadeau | Yankton, SD 57078 | $6,416 |
110 | Bradley A Johnson | San Antonio, TX 78249 | $6,229 |
111 | Cindy Lefeber | Harlan, IA 51537 | $6,229 |
112 | Dan Auch | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $6,172 |
113 | Jared C Seiler | Yankton, SD 57078 | $5,998 |
114 | Philip Bennett | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $5,894 |
115 | Tom Healy | Irene, SD 57037 | $5,841 |
116 | , | $5,796 | |
117 | Richard Lane | Yankton, SD 57078 | $5,724 |
118 | , | $5,724 | |
119 | Fauneil Pospishil | Irene, SD 57037 | $5,600 |
120 | Sharon Rae Hanson Irrevocable Trust | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $5,541 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”