Farm Subsidy information
Yankton County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Yankton County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 835
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yankton County, South Dakota totaled $23,120,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Paul O Helgerson | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $22,893 |
142 | Michael Dale Swensen | Irene, SD 57037 | $22,736 |
143 | James Stark | Utica, SD 57067 | $22,600 |
144 | Jsh Enterprises LLC | Yankton, SD 57078 | $22,541 |
145 | Michael J Pavel | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $22,351 |
146 | Travis D Devine | Yankton, SD 57078 | $21,905 |
147 | Brian Goehring | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $21,762 |
148 | Hertz Ranch Inc | Menno, SD 57045 | $21,686 |
149 | Steve E Anderson | Volin, SD 57072 | $21,491 |
150 | Shad Bratberg | Gayville, SD 57031 | $21,154 |
151 | Janet Ausdemore | Yankton, SD 57078 | $21,011 |
152 | Jack Wendell Johnson | Irene, SD 57037 | $20,896 |
153 | Paul R Weidenbach | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $20,389 |
154 | David Charles Stibral | Tabor, SD 57063 | $20,354 |
155 | Marla J Peters | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $20,063 |
156 | Steven H Nelson | Viborg, SD 57070 | $19,875 |
157 | Kellin J Kirschenman | Menno, SD 57045 | $19,700 |
158 | Steven Hauger | Irene, SD 57037 | $19,675 |
159 | Casey D Kruse | Lesterville, SD 57040 | $19,428 |
160 | Tyler R Hoxeng | Volin, SD 57072 | $19,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”