Conservation Reserve Program in Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 19,569
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Tennessee totaled $429,601,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dorothy Moore Farms | Old Hickory, TN 37138 | $339,230 |
82 | John B Marsh Jr | Medon, TN 38356 | $337,306 |
83 | Charles H Mcbride | Lexington, TN 38351 | $333,021 |
84 | Charles-charles Mitchell Culver Lv Trust Culver | Dresden, TN 38225 | $332,837 |
85 | Clinton Evans | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $330,162 |
86 | Paul Toombs | Mc Kenzie, TN 38201 | $329,721 |
87 | Couch Farms | Jackson, TN 38301 | $326,128 |
88 | Huffstetler & Sons | Greenfield, TN 38230 | $324,569 |
89 | Frances Schisler | Leoma, TN 38468 | $320,137 |
90 | Clay Porter | Spring City, TN 37381 | $317,251 |
91 | Parminter Family Trust | Germantown, TN 38139 | $312,644 |
92 | Mary H Armstrong | Dyersburg, TN 38025 | $310,639 |
93 | James T Cowan Sr Family Trust | La Grange, TN 38046 | $310,197 |
94 | Ann Chamberlain | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $310,028 |
95 | Talmage Latham Crihfield Jr | Ripley, TN 38063 | $309,648 |
96 | Crowder Farms | Lawrenceburg, TN 38464 | $308,404 |
97 | Clabern G Johnson | Henning, TN 38041 | $308,206 |
98 | Zera Frances Campbell | Crossville, TN 38555 | $308,134 |
99 | Gabrielle Hryhorchuk Blake | Dyersburg, TN 38025 | $307,920 |
100 | Harold Berry | Cypress Inn, TN 38452 | $304,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”