Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 6,719
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Tennessee totaled $19,552,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Troy & Tammy Campbell Partnership | Somerville, TN 38068 | $56,410 |
42 | Bailey Farms | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $56,290 |
43 | Mcnabb Farms | Somerville, TN 38068 | $56,235 |
44 | Keathley Farms | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $55,586 |
45 | C E Luckey & Sons | Humboldt, TN 38343 | $54,858 |
46 | Allen King Farm Partnership | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $54,693 |
47 | Faron & Connie Beaird | Halls, TN 38040 | $53,765 |
48 | Erwin Farms | Covington, TN 38019 | $51,976 |
49 | Cold Creek Farms Partnership | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $51,069 |
50 | Taylor Bros | Bells, TN 38006 | $51,018 |
51 | Ricky & Kathy Young Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $50,715 |
52 | Dinah & Darrell Lowery | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $49,988 |
53 | Lindamood Planting Company | Tiptonville, TN 38079 | $49,446 |
54 | Sorrells Farms | Trenton, TN 38382 | $49,425 |
55 | Barnes Farms | Union City, TN 38261 | $49,348 |
56 | P & J Haywood Farms | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $48,566 |
57 | Hargett Farms | Bells, TN 38006 | $48,319 |
58 | Dean And Denise Speight Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $48,052 |
59 | B And M Shull Farm Ptr | Ridgely, TN 38080 | $47,894 |
60 | Larry And Darlene Knox | Alamo, TN 38001 | $47,755 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”