Tobacco Loss Assistance Program in Cheatham County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 521
Recipients of Tobacco Loss Assistance Program from farms in Cheatham County, Tennessee totaled $335,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Shores | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $2,015 |
42 | Steve Nicholson | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,909 |
43 | Robert Hughes | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,881 |
44 | Fred Pritchett | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $1,865 |
45 | Freddy Pritchett Jr | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $1,865 |
46 | Ronnie Parker | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $1,827 |
47 | Steven E Brock | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,817 |
48 | Jacky Harris | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,807 |
49 | Walter Weakley | Clarksville, TN 37043 | $1,760 |
50 | David H Krantz | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,728 |
51 | Darrell Thompson | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,724 |
52 | Earl Cornell | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,674 |
53 | B L & W Developers | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $1,672 |
54 | Robert D Adkins | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $1,666 |
55 | Jimmy Shearon | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $1,661 |
56 | Ricky Suell | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,652 |
57 | Darrell Gupton | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $1,615 |
58 | James D Barnett | Cedar Hill, TN 37032 | $1,558 |
59 | Scott Knox | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,555 |
60 | Hugh Krantz | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $1,548 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”