Farm Subsidy information
Cheatham County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Cheatham County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 992
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cheatham County, Tennessee totaled $8,996,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Steven E Brock | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $26,183 |
62 | Mark Head | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $24,647 |
63 | William J Kilgore | Joelton, TN 37080 | $24,591 |
64 | Harold Corlew | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $23,606 |
65 | Myles Nelson | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $23,382 |
66 | Darryl L Shearon | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $22,691 |
67 | Albert Hughes Jr | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $22,585 |
68 | Darrell Gupton | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $21,903 |
69 | Michael Gupton | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $21,405 |
70 | David Gupton | Clarksville, TN 37043 | $21,183 |
71 | Gilbert Spurlock | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $20,710 |
72 | Earl Cornell | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $18,857 |
73 | Mary Teresa Gupton | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $18,773 |
74 | Marie Alexander | Kingston Springs, TN 37082 | $18,339 |
75 | Will J Green | Kingston Springs, TN 37082 | $18,339 |
76 | Kyle Edward Jordan | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $17,955 |
77 | Taylor Clark | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $17,806 |
78 | Ruby G Jinnette | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $17,483 |
79 | James D Barnett | Cedar Hill, TN 37032 | $17,245 |
80 | Kim Hewitt | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $17,004 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”