Farm Subsidy information
Cheatham County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Cheatham County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 991
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cheatham County, Tennessee totaled $8,378,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Davidson/seeley Farms LLC | Adams, TN 37010 | $69,990 |
22 | Freddy Pritchett Jr | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $68,581 |
23 | Scott Knox | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $68,199 |
24 | Ebb Gupton | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $66,147 |
25 | J W Nicholson | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $65,950 |
26 | Roy G Batey | Hendersonville, TN 37075 | $65,668 |
27 | Garry D Weakley | Clarksville, TN 37043 | $61,991 |
28 | Charles E Balthrop | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $61,655 |
29 | James E Jinnette Jr | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $58,318 |
30 | Estel Hagewood | Charlotte, TN 37036 | $52,811 |
31 | Greg Balthrop | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $51,448 |
32 | Morris Bidwell | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $50,801 |
33 | Wade Drake | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $49,079 |
34 | John L Borum Jr | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $47,339 |
35 | B L & W Developers | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $46,815 |
36 | Charles C Head Jr | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $44,740 |
37 | Frank M Felts | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $43,842 |
38 | W H Nicholson | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $43,148 |
39 | Dan Andrews | Nashville, TN 37215 | $41,856 |
40 | Jason Balthrop | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $39,699 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”