Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Tennessee, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 199
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Tennessee totaled $1,318,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Willie J Crawford Jr | Celina, TN 38551 | $3,503 |
22 | Neal Austin Smith | Whitleyville, TN 38588 | $3,442 |
23 | Lincoln Wilkerson | Moss, TN 38575 | $3,299 |
24 | Nelson Kerr | Allons, TN 38541 | $3,258 |
25 | Rita Nell Browning | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $3,119 |
26 | George Melton | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $3,091 |
27 | Chase Emerton | Celina, TN 38551 | $3,038 |
28 | Neal Smith | Moss, TN 38575 | $3,028 |
29 | Michael Mcclain | Celina, TN 38551 | $3,009 |
30 | Ronald Dean Roberts | Lafayette, TN 37083 | $2,961 |
31 | Danny Stone | Celina, TN 38551 | $2,909 |
32 | Floyd Scott | Celina, TN 38551 | $2,760 |
33 | Christopher Brown | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,727 |
34 | Todd Lynn | Celina, TN 38551 | $2,697 |
35 | Melvin Grace | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,650 |
36 | Thomas Mullinix | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,644 |
37 | Christopher Lee Hampton | Celina, TN 38551 | $2,641 |
38 | Jeffrey R Clements | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,541 |
39 | Dennis Purcell | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,425 |
40 | David Smith | Moss, TN 38575 | $2,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”