Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Crockett County, Tennessee, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 529
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Crockett County, Tennessee totaled $2,873,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fincher Family Partnership | Halls, TN 38040 | $220,557 |
2 | Jordan Planters Partners | Alamo, TN 38001 | $107,348 |
3 | Kevin & Brooke Earnheart | Friendship, TN 38034 | $88,052 |
4 | Clearview Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $76,377 |
5 | Donald & Betty Prescott | Alamo, TN 38001 | $68,176 |
6 | East Farms Partnership | Friendship, TN 38034 | $67,402 |
7 | Manning Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $66,343 |
8 | Db Farms Partnership | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $66,162 |
9 | Larry And Darlene Knox | Alamo, TN 38001 | $64,989 |
10 | B&b Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $60,488 |
11 | Larry J & Brenda J Bushart | Friendship, TN 38034 | $56,542 |
12 | Crescent Oak Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $54,549 |
13 | Jeffrey W Lucas | Maury City, TN 38050 | $52,495 |
14 | Joe Bill & Jamie Henderson | Alamo, TN 38001 | $46,810 |
15 | Beaird & Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $46,731 |
16 | Brandon & Lauren Hughes Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $46,163 |
17 | Hart Farms | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $44,667 |
18 | Kelley Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $43,440 |
19 | Bailey Farms | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $43,269 |
20 | Daniel And Jill Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $42,573 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>