Farm Subsidy information
Crockett County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Crockett County, Tennessee, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 808
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crockett County, Tennessee totaled $19,637,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hargett Farms | Bells, TN 38006 | $227,942 |
22 | Jeffrey W Lucas | Maury City, TN 38050 | $220,818 |
23 | Gordon And Tammy Fisher Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $214,890 |
24 | Brandon & Lauren Hughes Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $214,394 |
25 | Bailey Farms | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $205,212 |
26 | Kelley Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $205,189 |
27 | Beaird & Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $200,347 |
28 | Randy And Linda Williams | Bells, TN 38006 | $194,468 |
29 | Rickey Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $192,608 |
30 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $192,331 |
31 | Henry Fincher Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $180,360 |
32 | Carter Farms | Maury City, TN 38050 | $177,152 |
33 | David & Carol Cooke | Crockett Mills, TN 38021 | $176,941 |
34 | Griggs Farms LLC | Humboldt, TN 38343 | $174,797 |
35 | Sdj Partnership | Bells, TN 38006 | $170,947 |
36 | William E Nichols Iv | Friendship, TN 38034 | $170,476 |
37 | Jacob & Camille Hutchison | Alamo, TN 38001 | $168,102 |
38 | Daniel Beaird | Halls, TN 38040 | $167,702 |
39 | Baker Porter | Alamo, TN 38001 | $163,413 |
40 | Jaime J Fincher | Halls, TN 38040 | $158,851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”