Farm Subsidy information
Crockett County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Crockett County, Tennessee, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 752
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crockett County, Tennessee totaled $9,642,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelley Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $91,558 |
22 | William E Nichols Iv Farms | Friendship, TN 38034 | $91,177 |
23 | Jacob & Camille Hutchison | Alamo, TN 38001 | $90,698 |
24 | Bailey Farms | Gadsden, TN 38337 | $90,126 |
25 | Dwayne Porter | Alamo, TN 38001 | $89,102 |
26 | Manning Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $85,386 |
27 | Randy And Linda Williams | Bells, TN 38006 | $82,732 |
28 | Hank & Donna Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $82,731 |
29 | Rickey Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $78,730 |
30 | Jeffrey W Lucas | Maury City, TN 38050 | $77,250 |
31 | Richard L Ward | Alamo, TN 38001 | $76,509 |
32 | A & S Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $71,370 |
33 | Brandon & Lauren Hughes Farms | Alamo, TN 38001 | $71,312 |
34 | Kelley Cooke | Alamo, TN 38001 | $70,689 |
35 | Daniel And Jill Beaird Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $69,737 |
36 | Hargett Farms | Bells, TN 38006 | $66,660 |
37 | David & Carol Cooke | Crockett Mills, TN 38021 | $65,539 |
38 | Terry & Sharon Beaird | Halls, TN 38040 | $62,429 |
39 | Jaime J Fincher | Halls, TN 38040 | $61,014 |
40 | Baker Porter | Alamo, TN 38001 | $60,251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”