Total Commodity Programs in Decatur County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 678
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Decatur County, Tennessee totaled $8,262,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Randy Hayes | Sardis, TN 38371 | $17,510 |
102 | Billy E Maness | Huntsville, AL 35801 | $17,259 |
103 | Allan Dean Miller | Parsons, TN 38363 | $17,013 |
104 | Jerry F Harrington | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $16,942 |
105 | Denny Broadway | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $16,800 |
106 | Mable J Brasher | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $16,699 |
107 | Nealous Montgomery | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $15,925 |
108 | Bob Long | Jackson, TN 38305 | $15,735 |
109 | Todd Teague | Parsons, TN 38363 | $15,712 |
110 | Ann Blankenship | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $15,639 |
111 | Dacus Farms | New Johnsonville, TN 37134 | $15,525 |
112 | Skip Yarbro | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $15,401 |
113 | Connie Bartholomew Jr | Decaturville, TN 38329 | $15,225 |
114 | Dewayne Ball | Alamo, TN 38001 | $14,889 |
115 | Robert D Maness | Scotts Hill, TN 38374 | $14,577 |
116 | White Way Farms | Jackson, TN 38305 | $14,574 |
117 | James M Rushing | Maryville, TN 37803 | $14,262 |
118 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $14,014 |
119 | Kenneth L Michael | Scotts Hill, TN 38374 | $13,945 |
120 | Kenneth R Broadway Jr | Scotts Hill, TN 38374 | $13,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”