Market Gains in Dyer County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 656
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Dyer County, Tennessee totaled $9,702,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas M Walker | Covington, TN 38019 | $61,338 |
42 | Larry Paschall Companies | Ridgely, TN 38080 | $59,383 |
43 | Moody Properties Inc | Dyersburg, TN 38025 | $59,030 |
44 | Cherry-nichols Farms Inc | Friendship, TN 38034 | $58,899 |
45 | Donald W Holland | Friendship, TN 38034 | $58,518 |
46 | Crook Planting Company-old | Halls, TN 38040 | $57,681 |
47 | James Jasper M Jaquess | Tigrett, TN 38070 | $57,195 |
48 | Joe A Smith | Finley, TN 38030 | $53,883 |
49 | Billy C Ayers | Newbern, TN 38059 | $52,751 |
50 | Keith Sims | Newbern, TN 38059 | $52,660 |
51 | J & L Gregory Farms | Newbern, TN 38059 | $50,579 |
52 | Jimmy Putman | Friendship, TN 38034 | $49,893 |
53 | Walter M Thompson | Friendship, TN 38034 | $47,122 |
54 | Gene A Austin | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $45,736 |
55 | Cook Implement Co Inc | Halls, TN 38040 | $44,452 |
56 | Jimmy Joe Welch | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $43,336 |
57 | Estate Of Betty Harper | Alamo, TN 38001 | $43,193 |
58 | Tommy D Stallings | Friendship, TN 38034 | $42,681 |
59 | T & M Flp | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $41,284 |
60 | Tommy D & Lana Stallings | Friendship, TN 38034 | $40,249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”