Direct Payment Program in Giles County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 872
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Giles County, Tennessee totaled $4,911,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Dunavant | Ethridge, TN 38456 | $40,209 |
22 | James B Erwin | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $39,129 |
23 | Chris Edgmon | Prospect, TN 38477 | $38,085 |
24 | Jay White | Prospect, TN 38477 | $37,798 |
25 | Pat E Sulcer | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $36,196 |
26 | Kathleen S Wakefield | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $35,093 |
27 | Ed T Petty & Sons | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $34,894 |
28 | Rickie L Mcgee | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $34,836 |
29 | Edward R Bass | Prospect, TN 38477 | $33,974 |
30 | Joe T Parker Jr | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $33,442 |
31 | James Michael Mayfield | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $33,432 |
32 | Donald S & Donald R Owens Inc | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $31,960 |
33 | Michael Goode | Minor Hill, TN 38473 | $31,248 |
34 | Paul Edgmon | Prospect, TN 38477 | $30,786 |
35 | Agnes Mayes | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $28,353 |
36 | Bill Dunavant | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $27,699 |
37 | Crow Brothers Farm | Prospect, TN 38477 | $27,626 |
38 | James A Rose | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $25,813 |
39 | Porter Hannah | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $23,790 |
40 | Joe Wade Hobbs | Lynnville, TN 38472 | $22,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”