Counter Cyclical Program in Hardeman County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 919
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hardeman County, Tennessee totaled $9,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lynda Jacobs | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $52,238 |
42 | Warner Farms | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $51,932 |
43 | Charles D Blanton | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $51,210 |
44 | Billy V Taylor Jr | Mercer, TN 38392 | $51,035 |
45 | Joe K Mcmahan | Hornsby, TN 38044 | $47,045 |
46 | Russell Deberry | Hornsby, TN 38044 | $46,293 |
47 | David Allen Mcnabb | Somerville, TN 38068 | $42,950 |
48 | Travis Fawcett | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $40,831 |
49 | Douglas Howell | Toone, TN 38381 | $39,098 |
50 | Coach Perkins | Grand Junction, TN 38039 | $38,630 |
51 | Wilson Powell | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $37,462 |
52 | Fawcett Lumber Co | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $33,932 |
53 | William Conrad Powers II | Somerville, TN 38068 | $33,000 |
54 | Judy A Mcnabb | Oakland, TN 38060 | $32,001 |
55 | Candice Carr | La Grange, TN 38046 | $31,610 |
56 | William Jerry Wilson Tr | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $31,297 |
57 | Emily Williams Dunn | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $30,648 |
58 | Duncan F Williams | Memphis, TN 38138 | $29,962 |
59 | Mary Frances Blalock | Birmingham, AL 35242 | $29,837 |
60 | Simmons & Son Partnership | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $27,870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”