Farm Subsidy information
Haywood County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Haywood County, Tennessee, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 535
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Haywood County, Tennessee totaled $6,410,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | John Ware Lonon | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $4,517 |
122 | Chad And Heather Hardy | Gates, TN 38037 | $4,467 |
123 | Sharon M Merryman | Powell, TN 37849 | $4,442 |
124 | Wiley J Harwell | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $4,375 |
125 | Louise M Cooper | Chapin, SC 29036 | $4,272 |
126 | , | $4,188 | |
127 | William L Howse | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $4,088 |
128 | Kaleb Edward Neal | Ripley, TN 38063 | $3,992 |
129 | Gerald Thomas Friedman | Stanton, TN 38069 | $3,936 |
130 | George I Newman | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,836 |
131 | Betty C Bellamy | Nashville, TN 37221 | $3,703 |
132 | Harris Hughes Jr & Linda Hughes Farms | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,696 |
133 | Jimmy W Leath | Stanton, TN 38069 | $3,679 |
134 | The James T. Hughes Residuary Family Trust | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,662 |
135 | Helen E Shaw-newman | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,610 |
136 | John N Powell Revocable Trust | Spring Hill, TN 37174 | $3,527 |
137 | Wanda Kelso | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,432 |
138 | Warren Friedman | Stanton, TN 38069 | $3,402 |
139 | Floyd Stewart | Brownsville, TN 38012 | $3,341 |
140 | Alan E Moore Revocable Trust | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $3,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”