Farm Subsidy information
Lauderdale County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Lauderdale County, Tennessee, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 734
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lauderdale County, Tennessee totaled $19,470,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mid-south Family Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $1,092,632 |
2 | Pugh Brothers | Halls, TN 38040 | $717,181 |
3 | Pleasant Hill Farms Ptrs | Ripley, TN 38063 | $716,330 |
4 | Mcarmour Enterprises Ptr | Halls, TN 38040 | $642,691 |
5 | Fullen Ag Company | Ripley, TN 38063 | $525,272 |
6 | Peyton & Mathis Farms | Henning, TN 38041 | $493,315 |
7 | Eugene Pugh & Steve Pugh Ptrs-e&s Farming | Halls, TN 38040 | $454,658 |
8 | Simpson Farms Ptr | Ripley, TN 38063 | $324,223 |
9 | Crook Planting Co | Halls, TN 38040 | $295,340 |
10 | Roland C Henderson | Ripley, TN 38063 | $291,224 |
11 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $290,144 |
12 | Cold Creek Farms Partnership | Dyersburg, TN 38024 | $256,556 |
13 | William G Rhodes | Ripley, TN 38063 | $247,882 |
14 | George R Meadows | Ripley, TN 38063 | $240,128 |
15 | William M Harmon III | Ripley, TN 38063 | $233,074 |
16 | S & H Farms LLC | Ripley, TN 38063 | $231,576 |
17 | Jeffrey W Daniels | Henning, TN 38041 | $230,996 |
18 | Roger Meadows | Halls, TN 38040 | $226,571 |
19 | Stephen Lynn Floyd | Ripley, TN 38063 | $220,110 |
20 | Bill Sumrow Jr | Ripley, TN 38063 | $213,852 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>