Farm Subsidy information
Weakley County, Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Weakley County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,399
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Weakley County, Tennessee totaled $229,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Yarbro Farms | Dukedom, TN 38226 | $5,971,960 |
2 | Edward Reams Farms | South Fulton, TN 38257 | $4,302,457 |
3 | Brundige Farms | Martin, TN 38237 | $1,744,475 |
4 | Billy Scarbrough | Mc Kenzie, TN 38201 | $1,668,730 |
5 | Keith Fowler | Martin, TN 38237 | $1,487,522 |
6 | Edd S Scarbrough | Mc Kenzie, TN 38201 | $1,480,718 |
7 | Cooper & Sons | Sharon, TN 38255 | $1,459,315 |
8 | Kenneth Don Garner | Greenfield, TN 38230 | $1,436,628 |
9 | Davis Brothers Farms Inc | Martin, TN 38237 | $1,313,735 |
10 | Owen Brothers | Gleason, TN 38229 | $1,265,972 |
11 | Ronnie Bates Farms | Dresden, TN 38225 | $1,201,365 |
12 | Kenneth Marion Moore | Dresden, TN 38225 | $1,182,492 |
13 | Terry Jolley | Dresden, TN 38225 | $1,160,924 |
14 | R D Robinson | Sharon, TN 38255 | $1,148,877 |
15 | Walter L Riggs | Palmersville, TN 38241 | $1,121,570 |
16 | Waterfield Brothers | Sharon, TN 38255 | $1,115,759 |
17 | David Scarbrough | Greenfield, TN 38230 | $1,111,243 |
18 | Ronald & Janie Yeargin | Greenfield, TN 38230 | $1,107,986 |
19 | David F Oliver | Gleason, TN 38229 | $1,083,217 |
20 | Brent Allen Griffin | Gleason, TN 38229 | $1,013,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>