Farm Subsidy information
National Quality Cotton Association
Total Subsidies in National Quality Cotton Association, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 423
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in National Quality Cotton Association totaled $40,057,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | David C Chancy | Unadilla, GA 31091 | $60,317 |
182 | Michael Dee Mumford | Lucama, NC 27851 | $58,784 |
183 | Gary Powell | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $58,769 |
184 | Sycamore Farms Inc | Kinston, NC 28501 | $58,104 |
185 | Thigpen Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $57,742 |
186 | Carl M Williams | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $57,653 |
187 | Tony M Nevil | Register, GA 30452 | $55,696 |
188 | Lea N Calloway | Monroe, LA 71202 | $55,137 |
189 | Slm Farms Inc | New Bern, NC 28562 | $54,228 |
190 | Baugher Farms Inc | Manila, AR 72442 | $53,626 |
191 | M & B Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $53,621 |
192 | Michael Lewis Noles | Eastman, GA 31023 | $53,589 |
193 | Max G Futrell Jr | Goldsboro, NC 27530 | $53,430 |
194 | Ralph E Scott Jr Farms Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $52,906 |
195 | Raymond L Turner III | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $52,738 |
196 | Edward Allen Greer II | Pink Hill, NC 28572 | $52,559 |
197 | Dozier Farms | Plains, GA 31780 | $52,484 |
198 | Lawton Chad Heard | Newton, GA 39870 | $51,923 |
199 | Charles E Adams Sr | Senath, MO 63876 | $50,940 |
200 | Brody Ray | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $50,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”